Ex-South Carolina cop could soon learn fate for motorist's shooting



CHARLESTON, S.C. (Reuters) – A white former police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black man fleeing a 2015 traffic stop in South Carolina could learn as soon as Thursday whether he will spend the rest of his life in prison for violating the motorist’s civil rights.

Judy Scott, mother of Walter Scott, leaves the Charleston federal court house after the third day of testimony during the sentencing hearing of former North Charleston policeman Michael Slager in Charleston, South Carolina, U.S., December 6, 2017. REUTERS/Randall Hill

Former North Charleston police officer Michael Slager pleaded guilty in May to the federal charge spurred by the death of 50-year-old Walter Scott.

At Slager’s sentencing hearing in Charleston this week, prosecutors said the shooting was calculated, while the defense said the patrolman had felt threatened after Scott tried to take his stun gun during a struggle.

“The defendant shot Walter Scott in the back eight times as he was running away,” prosecutor Jared Fishman said during his closing argument late Wednesday. “It is time to call the shooting of Walter Scott what it was: It was a murder.”

The case drew national attention after a bystander’s video of the shooting became public, fueling fresh concerns about how minorities are treated by police in the United States.

A state murder trial ended last December with a hung jury, and state prosecutors dropped the murder case in exchange for the plea in federal court.

Scott family attorney Justin Bamberg, makes a phone call outside the Charleston federal court house during a break in testimony in the sentencing hearing for former North Charleston policeman Michael Slager in Charleston, South Carolina, U.S., December 6, 2017. REUTERS/Randall Hill

Slager, who has been in jail since his plea, had pulled Scott over for a broken brake light in April 2015.

Slager’s attorneys argued on Wednesday that his essential crime was not murder but voluntary manslaughter, which carries a lesser sentence.

Defense lawyer Andy Savage told U.S. District Judge David Norton that Slager had no way of knowing whether Scott was armed when Slager shot him, and that his flight from the officer made it reasonable to assume that Scott might be carrying a weapon.

”Our position is that the reasonableness of Mr. Slager’s actions were appropriate until they weren’t,” Savage said. “I’ll let the court make that decision.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Scott’s 17-year-old son made an emotional plea for the judge to sentence Slager to the maximum punishment of life in prison.

”My dad will never see my future kids, his grandchildren, and I know he would have loved them as much as he loved me,” Miles Scott said in a slow, soft voice. “I still can’t believe he’s gone.”

Reporting by Greg Lacour; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Lisa Shumaker

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.


Source link


Articles You May Like

Philippines’ Duterte promises payment as Red Cross stops COVID-19 tests
Chief Justice grants investigation into Parti Liyani’s complaint of misconduct against prosecutors
Canada’s Parliament Labels China’s Abuses in Xinjiang ‘Genocide,’ Urges Government Action
Police using sensors during firearm training to correct and improve shooting technique
Trump Aide Urges Democracies to Reject Chinese Campaign of Global Influence

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *